There is no satisfactory report about Modi's recent visit to AMU. So I had to write one! (One of the more neutral articles about it).
A routine criticism is, it's mere flattery: "AMU is mini India, its achievements and contributions are un-parallel" - Modi
When he implores the Muslim community's ELItes (ALIs of Aligarh Muslim University, for example) to join him in "nation building", he may mean - building the private empires of his friends, the Adanis, Ambanis etc.
Why? Because these guys, as clerks of an essentially kairos type of evil system "simulating good", own and "bless" and finance the careers of politicians, who come up with better or worse lies in their manifestos, even if merely 5 people vote, someone is declared the "winner" and "representative of the people"!
Anyway... in Modi's speech in the AMU ... there are other, much deeper levels of perfidy...
The fundamental insight is this: Modi went to Aligarh Muslim university. You can only understand this by understanding Ali.
"The Kharijites appeared during the crisis of leadership after the death of Muhammad. It broke into revolt against the authority of the Caliph Ali after he agreed to arbitration with his rival, Muawiyah I, to decide the succession to the Caliphate.
In more detail:
Ali fought the Battle of Siffin in 657 against Muawiyah. The battle ended in a stalemate with Ali entering into arbitration with Muawiyah.
A group of Ali's army, later known as Kharijites or Khawarij ("those who leave"), opposed against arbitration after the battle of Siffin, when he accepted arbitration with Mu'awiya. They were opposed to human judgement in the matter of religion.
The Khawarij opposed arbitration as a means to choose a new ruler on the grounds that "judgement belongs to God alone". They considered arbitration a means for people to make decisions, while the victor in a battle was determined by God.
(By the way the God closest to Allah is apparently Shiva
In 658 they violated their oath of allegiance and revolted. Ali defeated them at the Battle of Nahrawan. The killing of the Kharijites was "the most problematic event" during Ali's caliphate, because they had been among his strongest allies in the war against Muawiah. Ali had somehow fallen into the side of the enemies of truth and the good and the brave who take no shit... cowardice is the evil. One who gives in to cowardice in the face of dread evil, and accommodates himself in the ranks of the evil, turns himself evil, was the logic...
By agreeing to arbitration, Ali was guilty of "denial of the Truth", or truth in the form of articles of faith in Islam, and had become an apostate.
A Kharijite assassinated Ali in 661 CE. On January 26, 661, while praying in the Great Mosque of Kufa, Ali was attacked by the Kharijite Abd al-Rahman ibn Muljam, wounded by a poison-coated sword while prostrating during the Fajr prayer, whereby he died. That the Kharijites were closer to God (within the limits of the crudely pro-God system possible in those days) is seen in how they were "authorized" i.e. were allowed to walk in the mosque when everyone else is praying, so that they can either put the gifts in the hands of the good who pray, or even deliver death to those who pray who were believed top be serving evil, like apparently Ali had become.
A structure of stability is hard to arrange on earth. After Ali's death, the initial reformist spirit of Islam would be shattered into confusion. The one with whom Ali had cut a devil's bargain, Muawiyah I, became the founder and first caliph of the Umayyad Caliphate, less than 30 years following the death of Muhammad and very shortly after the reign of the four "rightly guided" (Rashidun) caliphs, and he was considered as the first of the "wrongly guided caliphs", seen as lacking in the justice and piety of the Rashidun although his name appeared on the coins, inscriptions, or documents of the nascent Islamic empire.
All this logic seems flawless. But no, Mohammad died of lightning. He himself lost sight of the real God.
So it is not!
The original Ali was good, that's why he is so celebrated, as he probably became nearer to the friend of earth, Shiva, through Muawiyah I.
The logic is not hard to get.
See, Ali has a great power of God's blessings (the magic lamp of Aladin), which he may use to oppose even the good Jafar (whose bird becomes red and angry as a result) -- and at worst -- the evil powers may use him to fight nature, make a more evil, subservient Jafar out of an originally good type of Jafar. Here is the risk of a wrong type of Ali.
That's the thing about heroes and villains, heroes turn dynastic paladins who turn villains (incremental parasitism) even as villains turn into hunted strivers turn into heroes.
Modi is not close to the Gods, but a greater demon under the anti-human Satan's servant Melek Taus.
So he can only be planning to get himself a few pre-justified "fallen Alis".
Modi seems to be tempting the young students with minor power to be received now in exchange for major power to be given later.
Selling your soul is never a good idea... it is the first sin.
Modi is playing the pastor of disaster! As Jeff Waters said, the pastor of disaster says, "what, you dare defy me, when I could slice you up with ease! I am temptation, so get down on your knees!" But never cut a deal with temptation.
The idea is to do good (stabilize the logical order), and good will automatically come in return as the system becomes stable.
The path is not to be bribed into obeying shady orders, in a position of incomplete understanding and enteric persuasion, for someone else's power!
Let's explore Modi's hidden side, how he seems to belong to the side of evil, the "originally for a good cause", but fundamentally evil (marital socialist) Kronos collective.
Modi "proved" his virtue by citing a law that banned Triple Talaq; this law, he calls "true feminism". A shallow "logic"...
What is Triple Talaq, anyway?
You can only understand this if you understand evil. How does evil work?
It is all about the Kronos collective's dominance of politics, attempts to sabotage good society by an evil parasitic layer.
The corruption continues, supporting itself by relations with similar cancers in other areas (the politician-terrorist ecology). The rot grows and finally, as the ancient Egyptians said, "When the governing class isn't chosen for quality it is chosen for material wealth: this always means decadence, the lowest stage a society can reach".
The pathway for the enforcement of the Kronos collective dictatorship is the marriage-routed politics of marital socialism...
The evil in our material plane is a mixture of twin evils... on the corrupted aspect of Mars, a patriarchical cultural trend among men trapped in the marital socialist system, who are supported by the power of corrupted sigma.
The corrupted sigma is the corrupted aspect of Venus , a "bad type of feminism or rather a parody of feminism, where the trapped females' hatred of boys (of whom they know only the marital socialist type) manifests into a mass, profitable reaction on the part of girls (who lock themselves away from boys until marriage). This reaction reaps a socioeconomic and political power, which is in turn dragged away by the "owners" of the Kronos collective-linked corrupted sigma structure, who also, while enslaved and powerless to change the system, are dominant over the common females ' collective under them.
In turn, the greater part of this power becomes the political power of the masters of their husbands, who tend to follow one or the other patriarchical culture that represses females (reinforcing the sigma system/fake feminism's "validity") and contributes to the "male", or worse half of all that is bad, a non-individualized patriarchical culture, which is profitable only to the lords of the Kronos collective; thus are elites born who exploit delta (or sigma) privilege, this is the meaning of the ignorance-based marital socialism of the corrupted material/political world, this is why the Kronos collective that came after the Golden Age of Chronos is merely a confused powergrab at the center of it all, resources sucked inward and spectacularly wasted as in wanton destruction, this is why man's character has been falling from the age of truth to the age of lies.
When you join this treacherous system, as a married husband, you get some helps, such as jobs because the Kronos collective invests in you, but ultimately they always take back more than they give, including your soul, which they do by compelling you to do bad things as a payback for the helps you'd received.
Individuals see through the exploitative apparatus, sooner or later in their lives, those who are trapped irrevocably yet intelligent often meet a sad end. In theory, divorce is an option, to get away from marriage which is "the servitude to Kronos collective with a potential for good", but usually the Kronos collective, if its profit from the arrangement is too much (and the cost to the soul of the couple is equally high) -- uses its collective power to enforce a "divorce is null and void" misjudgment on the married (you will always serve the kronos collective).
On earth, however -- because sigma tends to be locally logical and tied to anti-girl traders (police)... In case of males falling into patriarchism, girls can get a "talaq" i.e. a de facto divorce by running away into the ever-present sigma network (thus the queen on the chessboard can go the farthest, for example). They can always find a nobler man!
But in most cases, men could only get a working divorce (i.e. one which was upheld by the pro-God aspects of temporal reality against the Kronos collective aspects of temporal reality) when they had at least three divine-connected aka powerful supporters (that is the true meaning of "Triple talaq") affirming his position as valid, i.e. that his wife was indeed into anti-God activities, for example the bad feminism of the evil Kronos collective.
This is the REAL meaning of triple talaq!
It is not, as the Modi gang says - ""Triple talaq", as it's known, allows a husband to divorce his wife by repeating the word "talaq" (divorce) three times in any form, including email or text message. The Supreme Court declared the practice unconstitutional in 2017." It is merely this: The Quran established means to avoid hasty divorces.
You can always get 1 friend who'd agree that the marriage is a hell room (knowing that a false choice would ruin his reputation), and 2, but if there were 3 it's entirely possible that the boy is in trouble, was the logic...
You should understand that marriage is fundamentally evil, it is about power, not love, love would be given for its own sake.
By misrepresenting and banning that ancient tradition of Islam triple talaq system, the BJP has made it impossible for Muslim boys to escape from the Kronos collective of marital socialists (which is the stark, true reality of both HUF (that is why it is called "Hindu" undivided family, that is why the emphasis on religion, but such things are not known generally, because the Kronos collective is not known generally), and the extensive divorce litigations in America. Legal divorce works in theory, but sometimes the church bans it citing some religious argument of evil towards God ("Kronos collective"). The idea that Modi's law banning triple talaq equalizes Girls with boys is ridiculous! Girls can hardly escape easily in for example a place like the BJP rape empire -- due to collective corruption of divine logic by man to suit "his own ends", an arbitrary parody of Hinduism is seen in the BJP, which runs a rape culture in the temples of North India... that's why it wants the Andhra Pradesh temple land under Bajrang Dal instead of letting it be run by a private individual of high priest origin (the custom in South India).
By banning inter-religion marriage and locally corrupting Islam, this is the end state which the BJP wants to drag Muslims (and real, free Hindus) into: In areas corrupted by Bajrang Dal / Hindutva, we see noble females being caught: example, example, example, example... such patriarchical cultures are natural for the denatured, despined, deindividualized, mentally enslaved "males" of the Kronos collective!
Bajrang Dal's legacy of rape:
1) https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/meerut/Bajrang-Dal-men-raped-tried-to-hang-me-after-the-beating-Bulandshahr-woman-tells-court/articleshow/55641542.cms
2) https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bajrang-dal-leader-arrested-for-rape-threat-279173-2015-12-28 3) https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/rape-charge-on-bajrang-leader/cid/1778968
4) https://www.amarujala.com/uttarakhand/nainital/bajrang-dal-leader-sued-for-rape-haldwani-news-hld3852992105
These are merely the well-known cases, in most cases police don't accept complaint in places like UP. It's so common that articles are written about it!
In most cases, the victim doesn't live to file a complaint, anyway...
The true Hindu according to corrupted leaders like Yogi Adityanath, is actually a holier-than-thou rapist.
This is Modi's version of India that he wants the current generation of Muslim elites/Alis to help build!
Thus Modi's banning of Triple Talaq is not as pro-female as it seems, it is merely assists the more conservative people, who are more into the culture of the Kronos Collective, who refuse to abandon their ways of centralizing power and resources.
Modi is a charismatic speaker, like Hitler. But that is more the reason to read between his lines. Modi says such things:
"Whatever religion we are born in, it is important to see how to blend our aspirations with national goals. There can be ideological divides in society but when it comes to the nation's development, everything else is secondary. When it comes to the nation, there is no question of ideological differences. It is logical for me to say this here because AMU produced many freedom fighters - they had their ideological differences but they set that aside for freedom. Like freedom united them, we have to work on common ground for 'Naya Bharat'."
But this, too is a deception, Modi is merely claiming to be the voice of the nation! Modi is a leader of India merely in theory and talk, he is merely a leader of some BJP ministers (a few good) but more closer to certain spacefaring tribes (who call themselves "elite, upper caste NRIs" (non resident indians) or the "true Indians" or at least true owners or lords of India). He is not truly a leader of the Indian government, which is answerable to the planning commission which he tries to "dissolve" to that end he arbitrarily "archived" its website...
These upper caste high flyers in their vimanas, the "aditya lords", break up into castes, exploiting and looting real Indians living in India, but at times they make gangs for organized loot and even genocide of cornered people (as seen in Burma), including Hindus.
The origins of the BJP: A dacoit is "a member of a class of robbers in India and Burma, who plunder in armed bands".
"Many gangs operating in the Chambal valley were composed of higher castes and wealthy people" (Bhaduri, 1972; Khan, 1981; Jatar, 1980; Katare, 1972).
"Following intense campaigns by the Indian Police, highway robbery was almost completely eradicated in the early 2000s. Nevertheless, Chambal is still believed to be unsafe and bandit-infested".
Thus, as Lalu Prasad Yadav told the media in Patna: 'If I am a 'shaitan' because I am raising the voice against the RSS-BJP conspiracy to end reservations for Dalits and OBCs, Modi is a real 'Brahm Pishach' (super demon),' .
It would seem that Modi is trying to deceive the new types of Ali and turn them away from truth, justice, and piety...
He is trying to lure them towards the fate of the historical Ali i.e. defeat by truth (as victory of truth is inevitable)
When the pro-Modi former Deputy Chief Of Army Staff and former Vice Chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University, Zameer Uddin Shah, says about AMU students, "They invariably change their opinions and become ‘mureeds’ (fans/followers)." - it would rather seem that Modi is trying to lead them towards doom itself...
When this general related to Amit Shah says, "nipping bigoted social media in the bud was greatest-advantage of pm modis amu visit", I would say it is just that he had spoken too soon!
Social media is not bigoted, it's merely a platform; only content can be "bigoted"! It is just that nobody had posted a decent investigation... until now! And I hope General Uddin Shah will change his stance in public...
General notes:
God is not in complete control of the situation. He is merely the strongest good, not some invincibly strong power that demands to be obeyed because he is strong. We merely look up to god because of his goodness, not his power as such. But his excess pro-civil law power (relative to ignorant society's power) merely provides hope that the good will succeed; locally you thus say, why don't we say that God is omnipotent, but it is just how you play any game with the intention and self belief of winning, the idea of omnipotence was more a pro-good psychological tool than fact.
(Thus the evil in the world; men have to do their part too, in fighting evil, is the stark reality of the post-Abel situation, more on that later) .
And men, being men (but also women), do stand up for good. That's why we are homo sapiens sapiens.
Ww1 liberated Hades in Europe to turkey, ww2 and star wars largely liberated Zeus. Only a third is left to be fought or better, negotiated, to make an invincible pro-Zeus, pro-Hades intermediary "Poseidon", who connects the logic of earth and heaven (apparently that's the civil law originating from between the pole star and around Cygnus sector), and moves at will in the sea, as a messenger and to rehabilitate wayward pirates. Then will the true trinity (God speaking via Adam, God speaking via Abel (manifesting in the highest, as Hades/Baldur now "in Hel"), and God speaking via Cain (manifesting in the highest, as Poseidon) return, for a golden age of truth.
Don't know why petty minds like Modi or Trump can't seem to understand this, or seem so resistant to noble change.
WW3 need not be a war, it can be negotiation. In any case, Poseidon has to be connected to both Zeus and Hades. That is the purpose of the sea and the "tower of heaven and earth". Once this is done, an egalitarian order can unfold. Otherwise how will stability ever be achieved? There will always be borders and crossborder plunder by herds. The same law is required across all borders to preserve the good. The alternative is, inevitably, free for all piracy. Instead, as Luffy does, bring order to the pirates. Within a situation of free for all piracy, one can try to achieve good e.g. the "Jesus quest" of stabilizing near-earth, but that is a parochial view, as the world is moved by not just events on earth! If the Jesus faction or "the good guys" try localized quests, instead of reactivating the 3 elven rings (3 silmarils), it cannot lead to general stability or utopia... dominating the earth (capital of mankind) and imposing a "utopia on earth" is not the way to go about it, because the assumption that the earth alone is the source of evil just because its people were reduced, is a wrong assumption. What we (the historical direction of the "wars to end all wars", and today's most informed intelligence resolutions) want... is a utopia of egalitarianism based on Civil Law, not a top-down "divine" dictatorship of slaves as in the confederacy offered by the likes of Trump.
Utopia is not the accumulation of might "to each as per fate", but rather as the dissipation of matter and energy, the sharing of access to what nature has to offer... an unblocking of entropy's spillage - that alone is a stable situation, a system in which problems get resolved rather than multiply, unto a situation in which even talk is not required, for the problems are so few or nipped when they arise.
And about the post-Abel situation: confusion/chaos erupted because the "3 good kings"/3 silmarils system became a weak "2 kings system" because Cain's successor Khaine never could easily establish Baldur on earth after Abel/Baldur died, despite Asuryan's support (God said, "anyone who attacks Cain will be avenged sevenfold"). That is because the doomed "nephilim" (all Noldor except the 7 sons of Feanor and their supporters) made his work hard. Cain was even slandered. In fact Cain did not kill Abel. To say that is Babylonian babble, it is merely anti-Khaine propaganda by the "pastors of disaster" who sought to grab his powers (thus the revelations of Khaine)...
Comments
Post a Comment