Skip to main content

Nothing unexpected (All in a day's work)





The rationale I gave:



My video is FAIR USE, citing a brief excerpt from the public domain trailer (not even the film), with a self-evidently pro-public and counter-terrorist intention.

I have totally transformed the original content, which is totally unrelated to my video except as an item already in the public domain to be analyzed in the light of my commentary.

It is only a small part of the screen, dominated by my commentary.

Is one not allowed to criticize the flawed, outdated ideology of elites? How will society evolve?

Why should anyone be afraid of constructive criticism? That is always a fatal mistake.

If this is blocked, I'll take this case to not just the supreme court but also the judgment of the public* (military court), but since that Game Over aspect was a major part of modern history, especially my story, I will not remove it especially as this is plainly a case of fair use for the public's benefit rather than copyright infringement. How can citing a public domain trailer be equated with copyright infringement?


* Do not be under the impression that the public will not get to see this. The internet is not completely dead yet. If you try to block the easy way out that I offer (constructive criticism), I will simply host the film elsewhere. The public can still judge my position vs. yours. In any case, I will make my film available since this qualifies as fair use; trying to block it due to it citing a 1 minute trailer, is an illegal abuse of the spirit of open society & public domain critical discussion especially given the CT angle out here.


How much of the original content have you used?

I have only used excerpts from the trailer, and even that occupies only a fraction of the screen of my video.

Have you transformed the original content?

Entirely transformed it by adding commentary that provides most of the informational value.

Is your video a substitute for the original content?

It is completely different from the original content, in light of the commentary.


While I find a way to upload the whole 7 hour film for now, here is the blocked video, by the way:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Log #57 ~ twin flames, the math

Now technically,  me and my li'l  kyootsiee are twin flames ...   i.e., the sharpest form of "soulmates",  twin flames make new fronts for more logical / truer soulmates (all can aspire to be twin flames, but the point is to get away with it) ( For example ) that means both we're relatively most synced with the timeline and our lives are "synced" :) A sync at every interaction it might appear, here's the 90 minutes to midnight at the 90th. The analogy of all drops from a single splash falling at the same time on a quasiplane of reality that uniquely connects two twin flames, more easily fits to explain it all. https://t.co/undaFxWETa pic.twitter.com/9oBZsv3YIT — Timetin (your drewwgie) (@anand_droog) May 2, 2022 Say... There was this pattern... I had noticed it long ago, but on 30th Sep it got very sharp, so I tweeted about it: We're such yin and yang of the new.. Like today, old/boomer/deep time 73 stand in her way.. Just as I push t

Log#13 - Terran Intelligence Dossier (Beyond the "Covfefe" Mystery)

World Alert (= Alerta mundial) -  (Copiar en el traductor de Google para más traducciones de español / ruso / árabe / chino / japonés / francés / sánscrito / otras)) Learn English because there is also, an imperial truth, not merely primordial truth around  Terra Firma. If ever an idea is linked to a long blog which doesn't seem to mention it -- use 1 or more searches to find  it...   ========== After that one (haven't read) - And that one () -  There is, now, a new one, eh? - (A sequel to (not parody of) Tintin in America and further a sequel to the source cover i.e. 80 year anniversary).. i guess... ("Merge/Herge" friends ought to make a comic on these lines :D )/ Time to solve the mystery of the unhelpfully anti-human kind of "pixel trump" fase : Breaking news: anti-thinker AI panderers launch hack attack against naval intelligence (ca. 16th Jan, 2021) - I mentioned the " Group that I want to destroy " with 94* members (but i only archived it,

Log#56 ~ 56 can also be legit 9 + 47...

Some 56th log, this... about the 56th , and how it had been headcrabbed at earth... A while back I realized the joke about Modi's "56 inch chest" was about his cult exploiting a "no. 56" (upheld by far side girls, but there's a problem due to all the darkness covered in last post, that enables exploitation ...)   If a deep time 56 is dominant, then the good/time 56 finds it hard to establish itself. In this case, a  good/time 28 has it hard, because there is no 56 (28x2) that can sync with and support it, as the fake 56 is 'uge. So 28, which is technically supposed to be "doctors' number", gets monopolized by a deep time 28 pushed by the deep time 56. For example, when the deep time "Munnabai mbbs" (fake politician doctors) tried to enslave the doctors during the pandemic, 28 doctor leaders who refused to submit to the "doctors harassed by fascism" trend described in last post were punished for refusing to surrender the