Nothing unexpected (All in a day's work)

The rationale I gave:

My video is FAIR USE, citing a brief excerpt from the public domain trailer (not even the film), with a self-evidently pro-public and counter-terrorist intention.

I have totally transformed the original content, which is totally unrelated to my video except as an item already in the public domain to be analyzed in the light of my commentary.

It is only a small part of the screen, dominated by my commentary.

Is one not allowed to criticize the flawed, outdated ideology of elites? How will society evolve?

Why should anyone be afraid of constructive criticism? That is always a fatal mistake.

If this is blocked, I'll take this case to not just the supreme court but also the judgment of the public* (military court), but since that Game Over aspect was a major part of modern history, especially my story, I will not remove it especially as this is plainly a case of fair use for the public's benefit rather than copyright infringement. How can citing a public domain trailer be equated with copyright infringement?

* Do not be under the impression that the public will not get to see this. The internet is not completely dead yet. If you try to block the easy way out that I offer (constructive criticism), I will simply host the film elsewhere. The public can still judge my position vs. yours. In any case, I will make my film available since this qualifies as fair use; trying to block it due to it citing a 1 minute trailer, is an illegal abuse of the spirit of open society & public domain critical discussion especially given the CT angle out here.

How much of the original content have you used?

I have only used excerpts from the trailer, and even that occupies only a fraction of the screen of my video.

Have you transformed the original content?

Entirely transformed it by adding commentary that provides most of the informational value.

Is your video a substitute for the original content?

It is completely different from the original content, in light of the commentary.

While I find a way to upload the whole 7 hour film for now, here is the blocked video, by the way:

Comments

log#37 - flyting with a quantum cult seidmann and lecturing his patsy

Loki accused (some) Odin of male seidr in Lokasenna. So what did he mean? Now we see - deceiving (captive) girls for power. Yes I searched her profile and found that she's claiming to be India's military admin's dominant voice and stopping tank research: (so we see... the true nature of the CDS and his wife, head of "army wives union," described in log 36, it's as i suspected.. They're a front for such "philosophers of terror elitist origin)...in fact the clue is 106.... actually she proves just the Unilever (106) that I demystify in parts 5 and 6 of my film! Thus confirming the CDS detail described in the last post, also a Unilever asset. Keep up with my films ... Contd... I also unsubscribed from quora space "hear him", that's probably the selectively misogynistic yang to this selectively misandeic yin...

log#17: The Cult of the Dead -- Shokushu Goukan -- the creeping tentacles of Kairos

Everyone who enters the matrix to repair it, is deceived by its lies -- girls are deceived into sleeping with the manwiches, and even isolated thinkers deceived, into energizing the marred network's energy parasites, even angel birds, all deceived by the kairos. They know the truth we don't, as we are besieged; they spend lots of time fabricating lies, planting false props, the matrix, a make-believe "world". But who is the grand clerk, secretary, or enabler of the absurd? (and why does he do it?). Meet the demiurge... Brief introduction You also have to know about the phenomenon of selling your soul to the evil groupists , to understand all this. This is about the dead god and " the dead " (or undead) who enslave him and are enslaved by him. They follow an anti-life cult of the dead, like machines, of which as they say in Battlestar Galactica, "Humanoid Cylons, except the Cavil models, follow a monotheistic religion. Religious fanaticism partly motiva...

Log #57 ~ twin flames, the math

Now technically, me and my li'l kyootsiee are twin flames ... i.e., the sharpest form of "soulmates", twin flames make new fronts for more logical / truer soulmates (all can aspire to be twin flames, but the point is to get away with it) ( For example ) that means both we're relatively most synced with the timeline and our lives are "synced" :) A sync at every interaction it might appear, here's the 90 minutes to midnight at the 90th. The analogy of all drops from a single splash falling at the same time on a quasiplane of reality that uniquely connects two twin flames, more easily fits to explain it all. https://t.co/undaFxWETa pic.twitter.com/9oBZsv3YIT — Timetin (your drewwgie) (@anand_droog) May 2, 2022 Say... There was this pattern... I had noticed it long ago, but on 30th Sep it got very sharp, so I tweeted about it: We're such yin and yang of the new.. Like today, old/boomer/deep time 73 stand in her way.. Just as I push t...

KanafinwЯ's blog

Search This Blog