Skip to main content

Posts

Nothing unexpected (All in a day's work)

The rationale I gave: My video is FAIR USE, citing a brief excerpt from the public domain trailer (not even the film), with a self-evidently pro-public and counter-terrorist intention. I have totally transformed the original content, which is totally unrelated to my video except as an item already in the public domain to be analyzed in the light of my commentary. It is only a small part of the screen, dominated by my commentary. Is one not allowed to criticize the flawed, outdated ideology of elites? How will society evolve? Why should anyone be afraid of constructive criticism? That is always a fatal mistake. If this is blocked, I'll take this case to not just the supreme court but also the judgment of the public* (military court), but since that Game Over aspect was a major part of modern history, especially my story, I will not remove it especially as this is plainly a case of fair use for the public's benefit rather than copyright infringement. How can citing a public domai
Recent posts

Releasing page 122 for free in national interest...

Buy the book (& read other sample pages) here at Amazon!

Chronorium, the 3-body problem

There was only the long work to finish, so I never really did say about it to anyone. I can’t believe it, I finished the long work of around 13 years! Here you are, Chronorium: Renaissance Unpaused . Above link has a short description; describing my book is not primarily this post’s purpose. (This optional video describes it, excuse the background noise! I think it was raining … : ) Anyway, this post… On the day I released my book, I made an IG post about the much misunderstood (or most profitably misexplained) 3-body problem. But IG posts have a 2200 character limit, so I couldn’t elaborate too much, so I do that here. Read this text again with the book handy; further reading is cited as (pg. number = refer that page from Chronorium… in my life I’m going to be dropping pg. numbers at the drop of a hat as nonchalantly as bibliolaters drop psalm numbers!) Scientism, the priesthood of the current establishment, gives the Google search results number 1 official Wiki page “about 3-body pro

Bahubali - the post-conclusion (Dodging Youtube red tape ...)

This was to be part of a full film described here , now I'll reupload that and without this above video I guess.  Reference about why (See full  tweets thread!): What? How is it illegal to comment on a film? I just had 4 minutes of that film to tell the truth about fascism - I will reupload without this Bahubali part on Youtube - but make sure the world is knowing this truth one way or the other - from the horse's (your) mouth... hahaha! pic.twitter.com/dFmffGvyDl — Timetin (your drewwgie) (@anand_droog) January 24, 2024 By the way upload complete!   

#Log60: Hmmm, timely & Gronkowski

Timely comment on my friend's fb post ... I probably don't understand you entirely;😘 Here are some of my views on some such subject... I think there's some divergence in your paragraph's last part and my view... that is captured well in the disagreeing/ironic tone in "now that we are dead": Hetfields finicky tone is because, from that perspective, middlemen between us come even before nobler / more nonlinearly capable earthlings like me  (even if we are the only ones who can as you'll now see, repair the evidently suboptimal (wrt entropy) situation).  Maybe my submission won't pass mods, so :) CEO BGR?🤷‍♂️ Of elites generally: Good on the wall (andram? https://t.co/maKEDzErk1 ) could help but are separated from the nobility by privileged middlemen who push both sides vs. nobility, isolated, kept in silence https://t.co/HsSUxjHQeT https://t.co/xU8uwLorcu pic.twitter.com/t2uSAWlwOZ — Timetin (your drewwgie) (@anand_droog) October 25, 20

Log#59 ~ The Mysteries of Rome

In the style of log 57 (and also log 58 ), the nice news, sweetie climbed to 1888 today, highest she's ever been!   So, number of the day = 87 :)   Not everyone likes a sweetheart, weird.  Well, I had said it already . Now other more well-known people say it, they have to react. BJP on Thursday said AAP Gujarat president Gopal Italia used derogatory "words for PM Modi's mother ". Modi (along with his pseudo-feminist* sidekick Irani) gets cranky if anyone spells out his diagnosis: an Oedipus complex unbecoming of the PM of 🇮🇳. * if she was a feminist she would have rejected turbans to solve Iran's hijab crisis. But she wears 'global guru' turban in goa. https://t.co/4uMq10FqzK pic.twitter.com/lJlj4Bvbcp — Timetin (your drewwgie) (@anand_droog) October 14, 2022 This post is about that... a bunch of funny synx...        Ref: mystery of Gobi desert   ("The one of greater status than Baldrick, has a cunning plan")                        

#58: Quantum Mysteries - II

You remember the video I made about the gravitron of the earth direction?  And how it can match even with the "systemic gravitron" ...? And .. you do recall all the assertions made (by the " established kairos elites ", the " only legit quantum 7 " etc.)...  about how "h is insignificant, i is unreal?" Update on all that! I was just solving a question today (for money....  :o ), that I stumbled across the exact meaning of "entanglement", about how i = Q, h = P (or i = P, h = Q) is possible (real, significant), i.e. a stable earthlings' gravitron that can help earthlings break on through to the other side, past the middlemen siege. (It exploits the strong Q/17 (as in Quora symbol, Q ) red CT and the "P" (Cain CT), so it involves Q and P). So here is the question: And here is the answer I wrote, about how the "classical (quantum) assumption" is wrong,  ... there's no strict requirement of "instruction sets