The void seems more associated with the ideas of dark matter and energy. The entropic “clawing” of dark matter: “A team of scientists is suggesting that a "mystery substance" (or some call it "force") called “quintessence” permeates the cosmos. In 1998, researchers found that the amount of the mysterious force was fixed per unit of volume of space as a “cosmological constant”.” That quintessence is fixed per unit volume as a constant is a key insight – when matter is removed from a volume, this volume becomes more like "the warp", and entropy pulls its due share of matter towards the warp: the law of entropy, energy and matter dissipation. Quintessence is neither a force nor matter nor energy, but more like the product of energy and matter. Let’s explore this by a thought experiment. The idea of gravity as it is presently described, as a “pull between matters”, seems simplistic and absurd. As seen in gas molecules that bounce away from each other in a closed volume, it follows from the principle of entropy that the elements of free matter (as opposed to “congealed matter” that is more solid than gas/liquid) by default repel each other, rather than attracting each other, spreading to all parts of an available volume. Say we start with a meta-void-like volume V that has an equal distribution of gas or rather “almost liquid” matter – say, from here, somehow, matter “congeals”, say towards the center of the volume V (as a “void” forms in the outer parts of this volume V), into negative potential energy solid matter, e.g. in metals, “negative potential energy” results from how energy is consumed by the matter and stored as its attractive force-projecting (that hold back any “energised” e.g. heated matter from pulling away) metallic bonds; the metallic bond has a large variation in energies, ranging from 68 kJ/mol for Mercury to 850 kJ/mol for Tungsten. If you provide energy, it can be overcome; for example, “metals can exist as gases as long as they are hot enough”. The crucial insight is this: if the matter in metal has been “stripped” of energy so that it huddles with each other instead of bouncing around – and if energy can indeed not be destroyed – then, where is the positive counterpart of this negative gravitational energy? Given the logic seen in below diagram, it is in the outer “void” in the volume V, in the form of dark matter/energy, and all matter left within this void is called “dark matter”. Gravity is not "attraction between masses", it is more related to the dark energetic pull of dark matter, felt by high density or 'congealed' matter, it is just how a gas released into the middle of an empty jar is “pulled” into the empty space in the jar – this is the “clawing” by warp force by virtue of quintessence. Were it not for the bonds between molecules in solids, such as the metal bonds – matter entropically repels matter. Light is merely the least amount of matter that can break free escaping as and when it attains the least amount of energy required to escape “normal” matter.
Thus there is less matter but more energy per unit matter in the void, but there is more matter per unit energy in the “normal” world. The “product of energy and matter”, then, seems fixed in any volume in all worlds, which is why I called quintessence a “product of energy and matter”. There is variation of density and life in both normal world and void.
The void contains a more energetic matter capable of long life and sheer technological and unworldly wonders (unlike how, in realspace, we see a fight for energy, only naturally giving birth to imperialism, as the little energy that remains is concentrated in a few, like dancing and singing life forms wasting energy, but also at times righteous use of energy as in some of the more scouring of stars; there is so much excess matter in the normal world, that certain structures have evolved in the void which assist the entropic clawing back of some matter into the void. At such transfer points of matter are seen “black holes”. Luckily for those in the “normal universe”, the excess energy of dark matter is readily shared in exchange for matter (e.g. light bearing matter moving into the black hole): "Hawking radiation is black-body radiation that is predicted to be released by black holes, due to quantum effects near the black hole event horizon” (black hole’s edge). “The requirement that black holes lose energy into the wider universe, and therefore can "evaporate", are both a result of analysing black hole thermal equilibrium combined with extreme redshifting effects very close to the edge, with some consideration of quantum entanglement effects”.
Black holes are enigmatic entities, which perhaps suck up matter only to distribute it into the wider void. The idea that black holes have a “huge density, about two quadrillion grams per cubic cm” – is perhaps just a conspiracy theory by worlds that have fallen victim to its pull.
Feedback:
Teodora Kamenova: Who said "gravity is attraction between masses"??? And how it follows the principle of entropy? I am very curious. First humans don't know what gravity is because we still didn't find graviton, second, scientists suggest what Einstein believed gravity is - curvature of space time due to mass of an object. In fact, there is no attraction at all, principle of equivalence between gravity and acceleration suggests gravity is no force at all. If one accelerates its speed will experience same effect as gravity.
Me: Fools like Newton said it is "attraction between masses"...
And the problem with the term "spacetime" is that it vaguely, almost religiously defined. If you say gravity is due to mass influence on spacetime then you agree, matter congealing is the root cause of gravity.
But I say this "force" is because of entropy (felt as a pull on congealed energy/matter from the direction of empty space just how gas spreads if injected in a vacuum), which in a deep sense is an effect caused by the quintessence value of all space being a "cosmological constant"; thus the void, rather the dark energy within it, "pulls" free matter like gas towards it; this is misunderstood as "gravity" between matter.
From a so-called "scientological" perspective, however, Einstein's famous theory is merely a metaphor. It is wrong, because it only accounts for WW1 and WW2. E might then have been MC^2, but even the stupidest among the learned fools can tell that the true answer is that Eactual = Æ = M^3 = C^3. It is the true equation of real stability (for example, "Star Wars" proved the unsuitability of the E = MC^2 axiom).
Everything can be explained in terms of entropy whose root is quintessence – chemical reactions, and gravity, and perhaps even electromagnetics (and perhaps even time itself), so digging more into the entropy + quintessence paradigm is key to unlocking grand unified theory. Some people talk about "flow", in truth, entropy is the flow of the universe and if you aid it (like if you are fire itself), the soul energy increases.
- Excerpt from my upcoming book (no working title)
Comments
Post a Comment